The idea that reality evolves through an endless dance of fundamental atomic geometric shapes with an ethical purpose, became the foundation of science in 3rd century BC Greece. Plato’s Academy called it Science for Ethical Purposes. The Epicurean University called it the Science of Universal Love. The movement of the moon, echoing the atomic dance of life, was seen to influence the female cycle. The ethical purpose, in this case, was carried out to explain mothers’ love and compassion for their children, giving sex potentially infinite ethical value.
Greek philosophers argued that religious beliefs were not part of the atomic purpose, and others argued that traditional cultural virtues contributed to the evolution of humanity. A crucial debate at the time was that healthy human development required a scientific understanding of infinity. This understanding was associated with a sexually oriented joie de vivre associated with the eternal atomic dance that creates a desire to love and protect children.
Greek science was invented to save civilization from the process of extinction, recorded in the fossil record. In particular, the term ‘savior’ was applied to the teachers of the Epicurean school. The Roman Government considered this idea as a threat to the stability of their Empire. However, it succumbed to Christian ideology during the 5th century AD. At that time, science was an instrument controlled by religious dogma for the purpose of military conquest instead of reasoning about the infinite ethical purpose of the geometric atomic dance of life.
The mathematical understanding of the dance of life under religious control during the Middle Ages was to ensure that a particular creed developed science to protect itself from military conquest. Sexual selection focused on the physical attributes of the warrior class, echoing the primitive survival mentality of previous life on earth, most of which had gone extinct. The infinite mathematical conjecture was completely banished from all scientific reasoning as a treacherous heresy. Giordano Bruno in 1600 was burned alive by the Christian church in Rome for teaching about it at Oxford University.
The resulting supreme law of science became one of cancerous growth and development towards certain extinction and therefore cannot be considered ethical. The genius of Einstein, who initially agreed with that unethical proposition, provided the solution to this problem. His “we can’t solve problems using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them” meant that science needed to alter its governing logic.
If humanity is to prosper, it must confront modern science’s obsession with humanity’s certain extinction. That will imply a recomprehension of our sexual mentality. The infinite geometric logic involved in the dance of life generates a tinderbox of emotional thoughts and feelings beyond current scientific understanding. With all the best intentions, religious concepts of infinity are of little pragmatic help. This is demonstrated by the current exposure of organized child abuse within the Christian Church and the degrading use of sex associated with acts of Islamic religious terrorism. The complexity and dynamics of sexual reality require a much deeper and more compassionate understanding.
Science is an incredible wonder. However, their use of information and communication devices sparked a 3D dysfunctional global epidemic of false financial expectations that is unethical. The mass manufacturing of such devices is transmitting dysfunctional information. It uses artistic knowledge to generate false social anticipation through the use of geometric mathematics similar to the addiction creation associated with operating poker machines.
Science must give up its obsessive intolerance of research to link human evolutionary survival to infinite fractal logic. In the current cancerous situation, all logic of information and communication obeys only the laws of universal chaos. Restructuring this outdated law will allow crucial relevant scientific research to proceed. In quantum biological neurological cancer research, living information is known to flow in the opposite direction to the quenching chaos energies. It is important to investigate the reasoning that living emotional information, when entangled with the energy of chaos, generates an evolutionary universal consciousness.
The procedure that science could use to solve this problem is simple. It cannot wait for political leaders to come up with persuasive religious ideas about ethical immortality. That would be counterproductive, since it cannot be argued scientifically. Religion and science are still locked in an emotional power struggle that the 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes described as one that leads to continuous cycles of destructive conflict throughout the history of evolving civilizations. However, in the name of cancer research, relevant controversial geometric scientific concepts can be programmed into a computer to derive a human survival plan. At present this is impossible because modern science is inherently cancerous and cannot generate such non-cancer futuristic simulations.
Sigmund Freud described this scientific obsession with our extinction in his ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’. He described science as the use of inorganic chemistry to force the science of organic life back into an inanimate state. As the father of psychoanalysis, he dedicated his life to freeing the human mind from this emotional dictatorship of the death cult. As an influential Freemason, his attempt echoed the centuries-long battle between the Christian Church and Freemasonry’s naive and failed attempt to free humanity from what he called the principle of destruction espoused by science. The 1948 freemasonry book ‘Freemasonry Its Hidden Meaning’ clearly states that his purpose was to free humanity from the yoke imposed by the Destructive Principle. However, Freud’s condemnation of our death cult to extinction can now be used to help quickly design as an accurate model of human survival.
The simple idea of putting the subject of life’s complex geometric dance into a computer program to derive a model for the evolution of seashells caught on throughout the 20th century. IEEE, the world’s largest technological research institute, reprinted the life force discovery in 1990. However, the application of the ethical logic of third-century science in relation to the cancer-free geometric evolution of growth and development of seashells through space-time is now in violation. of the prevailing logic of the cult of human death. The seashell model of survival was acceptable, but the human model remains an emotional religious and scientific heresy.
Any major religion that perceives that the religion of another culture is using a dysfunctional cancerous methodology to ensure its own survival will try to rectify that situation. Traditional beliefs and customs, based on the emotion of sound and color, fused with dysfunctional geometric logic, akin to the mathematical science of poker machines, can only generate dysfunctional desires to accelerate extreme cultural chaos in an attempt to such rectification.
However, as soon as human survival plane simulations emerge, their first-principle geometric knowledge of the nature of cancerous growth and development can also be used to the benefit of the entire world population. The resulting wealth generated would be greater than the cost of destroying various national infrastructures. The ethical magnification of science will then become part of the universal consciousness, becoming aware of itself in order to shed its past carcinogenic character. As ancient Greek ethical logic argued, science can guide an ennobling government for the health of the universe by becoming part of its healthy growth and development, thus avoiding extinction. That project is now in the hands of scientists and artists who are promoting that idea internationally as an integral part of the 21st century Renaissance, which literally means the revival of ancient Greek ethical science.